E1-1500 vs Celeron 1047UE

E1-1500

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.48 GHz2013

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

E1-1500

2 / 2

660

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 1047UE

2 / 2

675

+2.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-1500 is positioned at rank 979 and the Celeron 1047UE is on rank 1170, so the E1-1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-1500

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

28338%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

26776%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

19442%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

5857%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

4639%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

4059%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

2325%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

2294%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

2089%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

2089%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

2065%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

2010%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

1982%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

1974%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

1956%

#979

E1-1500

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

100%

#980

Core i7-960

MSRP: $309|Avg: $110

100%

#981

Core i5-2405S

MSRP: $309|Avg: $120

100%

#982

Celeron 420

MSRP: $39|Avg: $15

99%

#983

Athlon II X4 615e

MSRP: $186|Avg: $30

99%

#984

Athlon X2 BE-2350

MSRP: $90|Avg: $10

98%

#985

Core 2 Quad Q8300

MSRP: $179|Avg: $10

97%

#986

Core i7-860

MSRP: $284|Avg: $30

96%

#987

Core i7-870

MSRP: $300|Avg: $80

96%

#988

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

MSRP: $136|Avg: $42

95%

#989

Core i3-6102E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $35

95%

#990

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

MSRP: $84|Avg: $5

95%

#991

Pentium Dual-Core E2210

MSRP: $98|Avg: $15

93%

#992

Core 2 Duo E7500

MSRP: $113|Avg: $10

93%

#993

Core 2 Quad Q9505

MSRP: $213|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE

#1158

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

4347%

#1159

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

4283%

#1160

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3932%

#1161

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3914%

#1162

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3878%

#1164

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3745%

#1165

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3591%

#1166

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3585%

#1167

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3489%

#1170

Celeron 1047UE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#1171

Core M-5Y70

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

100%

#1172

Celeron U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

99%

#1173

Celeron T1600

MSRP: $107|Avg: $15

99%

#1174

Pro A12-8800B

MSRP: $400|Avg: $40

99%

#1176

Core i7-2637M

MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A

97%

#1177

Athlon PRO 3045B

MSRP: $426|Avg: $180

96%

#1178

Core 2 Duo SL9600

MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A

96%

#1179

Core 2 Duo T5600

MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A

96%

#1180

Pentium N3510

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

96%

#1181

Core i7-7Y75

MSRP: $393|Avg: $285

96%

#1183

Core i7-4500U

MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A

93%

#1185

Athlon Neo X2 L325

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E1-1500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1047UE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.2% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	E1-1500	Celeron 1047UE
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($10)	⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the E1-1500 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 90% cheaper ($10 vs $100) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	E1-1500	Celeron 1047UE
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+878%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($10)	⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

E1-1500 Benchmark Check

Celeron 1047UE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-1500 and Celeron 1047UE

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E1-1500 and Celeron 1047UE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE — a 5.6% clock advantage for the E1-1500. The E1-1500 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Celeron 1047UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E1-1500 scores 660 against the Celeron 1047UE's 675 — a 2.2% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E1-1500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE.

Feature	E1-1500	Celeron 1047UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.48 GHz+6%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	40 nm	22 nm-45%
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	660	675+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	159
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	293

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-1500 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 1047UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E1-1500	Celeron 1047UE
Socket	FT1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	✅
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-1500) / VT-x (Celeron 1047UE). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the E1-1500 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	E1-1500	Celeron 1047UE
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x

💰

Value Analysis

The E1-1500 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Celeron 1047UE debuted at $100. At current prices ($10 vs $100), the E1-1500 is $90 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E1-1500 delivers 66.0 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 1047UE — making the E1-1500 the 162.9% better value option.