E1-1500 vs Celeron B720
E1-1500
Celeron B720
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-1500 is positioned at rank 979 and the Celeron B720 is on rank 1091, so the E1-1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar E1-1500
Performance Per Dollar Celeron B720
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | E1-1500 | Celeron B720 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | E1-1500 | Celeron B720 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of E1-1500 and Celeron B720
E1-1500
The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron B720
The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The E1-1500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron B720 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1-1500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 versus 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 — a 13.8% clock advantage for the Celeron B720. The E1-1500 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Celeron B720 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E1-1500 scores 660 against the Celeron B720's 665 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron B720. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E1-1500 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720.
| Feature | E1-1500 | Celeron B720 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.48 GHz | 1.7 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 40 nm | 32 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Zacate (2011−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 660 | 665 |
Memory & Platform
The E1-1500 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B720 uses G2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | E1-1500 | Celeron B720 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | G2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (E1-1500) / VT-x (Celeron B720). The Celeron B720 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E1-1500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | E1-1500 | Celeron B720 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The E1-1500 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Celeron B720 debuted at $70. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Celeron B720 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E1-1500 delivers 66.0 pts/$ vs 66.5 pts/$ for the Celeron B720 — making the Celeron B720 the 0.8% better value option.
| Feature | E1-1500 | Celeron B720 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-14% | $70 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.0 | 66.5 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on E1-1500 and Celeron B720
