E1-1500
VS
Core 2 Duo L7200

E1-1500 vs Core 2 Duo L7200

AMD

E1-1500

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.48 GHz2013
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-1500 is positioned at rank 979 and the Core 2 Duo L7200 is on rank 56, so the Core 2 Duo L7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-1500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
28338%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
26776%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19442%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5857%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4639%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4059%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2325%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2294%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2089%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2089%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2065%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2010%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1982%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1974%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1956%
#979
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#980
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
100%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
100%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
99%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
99%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
98%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
97%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
96%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
96%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
95%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
95%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
93%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
93%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo L7200

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
97%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#44
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
214%
#45
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
211%
#46
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
194%
#47
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
193%
#48
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
191%
#50
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
185%
#51
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
177%
#52
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
177%
#53
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
172%
#56
Core 2 Duo L7200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
96%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1-1500 (2013) utilizes 40 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE1-1500Core 2 Duo L7200
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo L7200 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE1-1500Core 2 Duo L7200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-1500 and Core 2 Duo L7200

AMD

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo L7200

The Core 2 Duo L7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the E1-1500 and Core 2 Duo L7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The E1-1500 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the E1-1500 scores 660 against the Core 2 Duo L7200's 685 — a 3.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo L7200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E1-1500 vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo L7200.

FeatureE1-1500Core 2 Duo L7200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2
Boost Clock
1.48 GHz
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
40 nm-38%
65 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
660
685+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-1500 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo L7200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-1500Core 2 Duo L7200
Socket
FT1
BGA479
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1