E2-3200
VS
Atom Z2560

E2-3200 vs Atom Z2560

AMD

E2-3200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Atom Z2560

2 Cores4 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-3200 is positioned at rank 855 and the Atom Z2560 is on rank 104, so the Atom Z2560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-3200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17812%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16831%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12221%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3682%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2916%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2551%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1461%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1442%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1313%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1313%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1298%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1263%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1246%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1241%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1229%
#855
E2-3200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
100%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
99%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
99%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
99%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
99%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
99%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
98%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
98%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
97%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
97%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
97%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
96%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
95%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z2560

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
96%
#92
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
278%
#93
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
274%
#94
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
251%
#95
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
250%
#96
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
248%
#98
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
239%
#99
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
230%
#100
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
229%
#101
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
223%
#104
Atom Z2560
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#106
Ryzen 5 2500U
MSRP: $349|Avg: N/A
99%
#109
Celeron 4305U
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
99%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
98%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E2-3200 leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom Z2560 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE2-3200Atom Z2560
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clovertrail (2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE2-3200Atom Z2560
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-3200 and Atom Z2560

AMD

E2-3200

The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E2-3200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom Z2560's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the E2-3200 versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 — a 40% clock advantage for the E2-3200. The E2-3200 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom Z2560 uses Clovertrail (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3200 scores 1,050 against the Atom Z2560's 1,056 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom Z2560. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE2-3200Atom Z2560
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+50%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Clovertrail (2013)
PassMark
1,050
1,056
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3200 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom Z2560 uses FC-MB4760 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-3200Atom Z2560
Socket
FM1
FC-MB4760
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z2560 includes integrated graphics (PowerVR SGX544MP2), while the E2-3200 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureE2-3200Atom Z2560
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
PowerVR SGX544MP2