E2-3200
VS
Core 2 Duo E6300

E2-3200 vs Core 2 Duo E6300

AMD

E2-3200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-3200 is positioned at rank 855 and the Core 2 Duo E6300 is on rank 1058, so the E2-3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-3200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17812%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16831%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12221%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3682%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2916%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2551%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1461%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1442%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1313%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1313%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1298%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1263%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1246%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1241%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1229%
#855
E2-3200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
100%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
99%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
99%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
99%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
99%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
99%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
98%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
98%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
97%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
97%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
97%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
96%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
95%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
48179%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
45524%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
33054%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9958%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6900%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3952%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3900%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3511%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3417%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3369%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3355%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3325%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
100%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
99%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
98%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
98%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
94%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
91%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
91%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
89%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
88%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
87%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
87%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
83%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
77%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E2-3200 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo E6300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE2-3200Core 2 Duo E6300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE2-3200Core 2 Duo E6300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-3200 and Core 2 Duo E6300

AMD

E2-3200

The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

The Core 2 Duo E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the E2-3200 and Core 2 Duo E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the E2-3200 versus 1.87 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6300 — a 24.8% clock advantage for the E2-3200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The E2-3200 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6300 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3200 scores 1,050 against the Core 2 Duo E6300's 1,055 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE2-3200Core 2 Duo E6300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+28%
1.87 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+29%
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,050
1,055
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3200 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-3200Core 2 Duo E6300
Socket
FM1
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-3200) / true (Core 2 Duo E6300). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

FeatureE2-3200Core 2 Duo E6300
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true