E2-3800
VS
Core 2 Duo U7500

E2-3800 vs Core 2 Duo U7500

AMD

E2-3800

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo U7500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.06 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-3800 is positioned at rank 1047 and the Core 2 Duo U7500 is on rank 1051, so the E2-3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-3800

#1035
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2583%
#1036
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2545%
#1037
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2336%
#1038
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2326%
#1039
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2304%
#1041
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2225%
#1042
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2134%
#1043
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2130%
#1044
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2073%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
99%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
98%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
97%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
96%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
95%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
95%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
94%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
94%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
94%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7500

#1039
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2629%
#1040
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2591%
#1041
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2378%
#1042
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2367%
#1043
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2346%
#1045
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2265%
#1046
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2172%
#1047
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2168%
#1048
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2110%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
99%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
99%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
97%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
97%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
97%
#1059
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
96%
#1060
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
96%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
96%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
94%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E2-3800 (2013) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE2-3800Core 2 Duo U7500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo U7500 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE2-3800Core 2 Duo U7500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+96%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-3800 and Core 2 Duo U7500

AMD

E2-3800

The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7500

The Core 2 Duo U7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 1.06 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The E2-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo U7500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 versus 1.06 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7500 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the E2-3800. The E2-3800 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3800 scores 1,136 against the Core 2 Duo U7500's 1,116 — a 1.8% lead for the E2-3800. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 136 vs 180, a 27.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 389 vs 320 (19.5% advantage for the E2-3800).

FeatureE2-3800Core 2 Duo U7500
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz+23%
1.06 GHz
Base Clock
1.06 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2048 kB
2 MB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Kabini (2013−2014)
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,136+2%
1,116
Geekbench 6 Single
136
180+32%
Geekbench 6 Multi
389+22%
320
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3800 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the E2-3800 versus DDR2-533 on the Core 2 Duo U7500 — the E2-3800 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The E2-3800 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (E2-3800) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo U7500). PCIe lanes: 4 (E2-3800) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo U7500) — the E2-3800 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (E2-3800) and GM965,945GME (Core 2 Duo U7500).

FeatureE2-3800Core 2 Duo U7500
Socket
FT3
BGA479
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+50%
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+700%
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (E2-3800) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo U7500). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo U7500 targets Ultra Low Voltage Laptop.

FeatureE2-3800Core 2 Duo U7500
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8280
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x
Target Use
Ultra Low Voltage Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The E2-3800 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo U7500 debuted at $100. At current prices ($20 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo U7500 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E2-3800 delivers 56.8 pts/$ vs 111.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo U7500 — making the Core 2 Duo U7500 the 65.1% better value option.

FeatureE2-3800Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP
$100
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$10-50%
Performance per Dollar
56.8
111.6+96%
Release Date
2013
2006