
E2-3800 vs Core 2 Duo U7500

E2-3800

Core 2 Duo U7500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-3800 is positioned at rank 1047 and the Core 2 Duo U7500 is on rank 1051, so the E2-3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar E2-3800
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | E2-3800 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | E2-3800 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+96%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of E2-3800 and Core 2 Duo U7500

E2-3800
The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.

Core 2 Duo U7500
The Core 2 Duo U7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 1.06 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The E2-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo U7500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 versus 1.06 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7500 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the E2-3800. The E2-3800 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3800 scores 1,136 against the Core 2 Duo U7500's 1,116 — a 1.8% lead for the E2-3800. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 136 vs 180, a 27.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 389 vs 320 (19.5% advantage for the E2-3800).
| Feature | E2-3800 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz+23% | 1.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 2 MB |
| Process | 28 nm-57% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,136+2% | 1,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 136 | 180+32% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 389+22% | 320 |
Memory & Platform
The E2-3800 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the E2-3800 versus DDR2-533 on the Core 2 Duo U7500 — the E2-3800 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The E2-3800 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (E2-3800) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo U7500). PCIe lanes: 4 (E2-3800) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo U7500) — the E2-3800 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (E2-3800) and GM965,945GME (Core 2 Duo U7500).
| Feature | E2-3800 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (E2-3800) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo U7500). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Core 2 Duo U7500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo U7500 targets Ultra Low Voltage Laptop.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8280 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Ultra Low Voltage Laptop |
Value Analysis
The E2-3800 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo U7500 debuted at $100. At current prices ($20 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo U7500 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E2-3800 delivers 56.8 pts/$ vs 111.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo U7500 — making the Core 2 Duo U7500 the 65.1% better value option.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Core 2 Duo U7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $10-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | 111.6+96% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















