
E2-3800

Ryzen 7 5800X
E2-3800 vs Ryzen 7 5800X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
E2-3800 vs Ryzen 7 5800X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
E2-3800 vs Ryzen 7 5800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
E2-3800
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8280, while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,136 vs 27,712).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +755.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 443.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌349% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while E2-3800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than E2-3800?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
E2-3800 vs Ryzen 7 5800X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3800
The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.


Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The E2-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 113.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X. The E2-3800 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3800 scores 1,136 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 184.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+262% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,136 | 27,712+2339% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 136 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 389 | — |
Memory & Platform
The E2-3800 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the E2-3800 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the Ryzen 7 5800X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (E2-3800) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 4 (E2-3800) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (E2-3800) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | E2-3800 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (E2-3800) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Ryzen 7 5800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8280 | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the E2-3800 was priced at $100, while the Ryzen 7 5800X came in at $449. On launch pricing ($100 vs $449), E2-3800 was $349 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the E2-3800 delivers 11.4 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 137.8% better value option.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-78% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4 | 61.7+441% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














