Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800

AMD

Radeon HD 3300

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3300

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $769 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 310.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3800

2008

Why buy it

  • 384.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2563.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 384.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 548.8% in PassMark G3D (824 vs 127), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 3300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $769 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 310.5% (4.2 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 3800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 versus the Quadro FX 3800's 824 — the Quadro FX 3800 leads by 548.8%. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 3800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3800). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800).

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Quadro FX 3800
G3D Mark Score
127
824+549%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1280+433%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS+209%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Quadro FX 3800
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 3300 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3800 carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3800) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Quadro FX 3800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Quadro FX 3800
DirectX
10.0
10_0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Legacy (Radeon HD 3300) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800). Decoder: UVD+ vs PureVideo HD.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Quadro FX 3800
Encoder
Legacy
PureVideo HD
Decoder
UVD+
PureVideo HD
Codecs
H.264/AVC,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Quadro FX 3800's 189W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 3300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Quadro FX 3800
TDP
186W-2%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
0.7
4.4+529%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3300 came in at $30, while the Quadro FX 3800 launched at $799. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 96.2% cheaper ($769 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 320% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3300 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Quadro FX 3800
MSRP
$30-96%
$799
Performance per Dollar
4.2+320%
1.0
Codename
Cayman
GT200B
Release
December 1 2011
November 11 2008
Ranking
#598
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.