
Radeon HD 3300

Quadro FX 3800
Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 3300
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $769 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅384.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2563.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3300 vs Quadro FX 3800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 versus the Quadro FX 3800's 824 — the Quadro FX 3800 leads by 548.8%. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 3800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3800). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127 | 824+549% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+433% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+209% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3300 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3800 carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3800) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Legacy (Radeon HD 3300) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800). Decoder: UVD+ vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Legacy | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | UVD+ | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264/AVC,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Quadro FX 3800's 189W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 3300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W-2% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 4.4+529% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 3300 came in at $30, while the Quadro FX 3800 launched at $799. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 96.2% cheaper ($769 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 320% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3300 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-96% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.2+320% | 1.0 |
| Codename | Cayman | GT200B |
| Release | December 1 2011 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #598 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















