Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 8850M
Quadro FX 3800
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8850M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3800 is positioned at rank 347 and the Radeon HD 8850M is on rank 329, so the Radeon HD 8850M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8850M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8850M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3800.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-18.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+18.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8850M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8850M
Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon HD 8850M
The Radeon HD 8850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 973 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 versus the Radeon HD 8850M's 973 — the Radeon HD 8850M leads by 18.1%. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8850M uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8850M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8850M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 973+18% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 640+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.8 TFLOPS+29% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8850M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8850M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8850M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12 (11_1)+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs UVD3 (Radeon HD 8850M). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 3.0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | UVD3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8850M's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8850M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 19.5+343% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8850M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | Venus |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #894 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8850M
