E2-3800 vs Pentium G640T

E2-3800 vs Pentium G640T Performance Spectrum

E2-3800

4 / 4

1,136

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G640T

2 / 2

1,139

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-3800 vs Pentium G640T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-3800 vs Pentium G640T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-3800

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8280, while Pentium G640T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,136 vs 1,139).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G640T

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $36 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.8 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while E2-3800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G640T better than E2-3800?

Yes. Pentium G640T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G640T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G640T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G640T is the better buy right now. Pentium G640T comes in $36 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 56.7% better value on MSRP (17.8 vs 11.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-3800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E2-3800 vs Pentium G640T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3800

The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium G640T

The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G640T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G640T. The E2-3800 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium G640T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3800 scores 1,136 against the Pentium G640T's 1,139 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium G640T.

Feature	E2-3800	Pentium G640T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+85%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,136	1,139
Geekbench 6 Single	136	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	389	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3800 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G640T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E2-3800	Pentium G640T
Socket	FT3	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (E2-3800) / not specified (Pentium G640T). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Pentium G640T requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	E2-3800	Pentium G640T
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8280	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the E2-3800 was priced at $100, while the Pentium G640T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($100 vs $64), Pentium G640T was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the E2-3800 delivers 11.4 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G640T — making the Pentium G640T the 44.2% better value option.

Feature	E2-3800	Pentium G640T
MSRP	$100	$64-36%
Performance per Dollar	11.4	17.8+56%
Release Date	2013	2012

Search E2-3800 on Amazon

Search Pentium G640T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.