E2-3800
VS
Pentium G640T

E2-3800 vs Pentium G640T

AMD

E2-3800

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium G640T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-3800 is positioned at rank 1047 and the Pentium G640T is on rank 848, so the Pentium G640T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-3800

#1035
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2583%
#1036
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2545%
#1037
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2336%
#1038
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2326%
#1039
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2304%
#1041
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2225%
#1042
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2134%
#1043
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2130%
#1044
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2073%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
99%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
98%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
97%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
96%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
95%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
95%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
94%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
94%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
94%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G640T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17512%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12015%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3619%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2867%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2508%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1437%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1418%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1291%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1291%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1276%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1242%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1225%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1220%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1209%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
97%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium G640T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E2-3800 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightE2-3800Pentium G640T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the E2-3800 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $20 (vs $69), it costs 71% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 244% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium G640T.
InsightE2-3800Pentium G640T
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+244%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-3800 and Pentium G640T

AMD

E2-3800

The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium G640T

The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E2-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G640T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G640T. The E2-3800 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium G640T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3800 scores 1,136 against the Pentium G640T's 1,139 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium G640T.

FeatureE2-3800Pentium G640T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.4 GHz+85%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Kabini (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,136
1,139
Geekbench 6 Single
136
Geekbench 6 Multi
389
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3800 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G640T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-3800Pentium G640T
Socket
FT3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (E2-3800) / not specified (Pentium G640T). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Pentium G640T requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureE2-3800Pentium G640T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8280
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The E2-3800 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Pentium G640T debuted at $64. At current prices ($20 vs $69), the E2-3800 is $49 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E2-3800 delivers 56.8 pts/$ vs 16.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G640T — making the E2-3800 the 109.9% better value option.

FeatureE2-3800Pentium G640T
MSRP
$100
$64-36%
Avg Price (30d)
$20-71%
$69
Performance per Dollar
56.8+244%
16.5
Release Date
2013
2012