
RADEON 9000 vs RADEON HD6410D

RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

RADEON HD6410D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank 742 and the RADEON HD6410D is on rank 340, so the RADEON HD6410D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8360% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9000.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8360%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8360%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $20 for the RADEON 9000, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 33740% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33740%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9000 and RADEON HD6410D

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON HD6410D
The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 8360%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RADEON 9000) vs 2 (RADEON HD6410D).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 423+8360% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+700% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+955% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+32% | 2200 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+700% | 4 |
| TMUs | 64+700% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+700% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+700% | 2 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9000 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB. The RADEON HD6410D offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 0% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 28.2+9300% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9000 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 and now averages $5. The RADEON HD6410D costs 75% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RADEON 9000) vs 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 28100% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $35-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $5-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 84.6+28100% |
| Codename | Strix Point | Dragon Range |
| Release | July 15 2024 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #312 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















