RADEON 9000
VS
RADEON HD6410D

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON HD6410D

AMD

RADEON 9000

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON HD6410D

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank 742 and the RADEON HD6410D is on rank 340, so the RADEON HD6410D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000

#731
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
108570%
#733
98420%
#734
98160%
#738
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
89260%
#739
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
88650%
#741
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
100%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
100%
#743
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
80%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
60%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
60%
#746
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
50%
#747
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
40%
#748
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
40%
#749
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
30%
#750
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
30%
#751
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
30%
#752
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
30%
#753
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
20%
#754
GeForce3
MSRP: $499|Avg: $49
10%
#755
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
10%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D

#330
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
898%
#332
814%
#333
812%
#337
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
738%
#338
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
733%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
100%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
94%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
#350
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
92%
#351
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
92%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON HD6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8360% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9000.

InsightRADEON 9000RADEON HD6410D
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-8360%)
Leading raw performance (+8360%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $20 for the RADEON 9000, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 33740% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON 9000RADEON HD6410D
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+33740%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9000 and RADEON HD6410D

AMD

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 8360%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RADEON 9000) vs 2 (RADEON HD6410D).

FeatureRADEON 9000RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score
5
423+8360%
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
4 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1024+700%
128
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS+955%
0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+32%
2200 MHz
ROPs
32+700%
4
TMUs
64+700%
8
L1 Cache
256 KB+700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
16+700%
2

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9000RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9000 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB. The RADEON HD6410D offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRADEON 9000RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 0% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureRADEON 9000RADEON HD6410D
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Perf/Watt
0.3
28.2+9300%
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9000 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 and now averages $5. The RADEON HD6410D costs 75% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RADEON 9000) vs 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 28100% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureRADEON 9000RADEON HD6410D
MSRP
$49
$35-29%
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$5-75%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
84.6+28100%
Codename
Strix Point
Dragon Range
Release
July 15 2024
January 3 2023
Ranking
#312
#843