
RADEON 9000 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank 742 and the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is on rank 384, so the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9000 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The RADEON 9000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 40% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9000.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-40%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+40%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $30 for the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 7.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9000 and GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 40%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 7+40% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+256% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+693% | 0.7488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9000 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has 512 MB. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON 9000) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 216mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9000 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299 and now averages $30. The RADEON 9000 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RADEON 9000) vs 0.2 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the RADEON 9000 offers 50% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-84% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-33% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3+50% | 0.2 |
| Codename | Strix Point | GF104 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #312 | #683 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















