E2-9010
VS
Athlon II X2 235e

E2-9010 vs Athlon II X2 235e

AMD

E2-9010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 235e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-9010 is positioned at rank 926 and the Athlon II X2 235e is on rank 888, so the Athlon II X2 235e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9010

#914
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1641%
#915
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1617%
#916
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1484%
#917
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1478%
#918
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1464%
#920
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1414%
#921
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1356%
#922
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1353%
#923
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1317%
#926
E2-9010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 235e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19931%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18832%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13674%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4119%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3263%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2854%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1635%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1614%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1469%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1469%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1453%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1413%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1394%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1388%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1375%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
95%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
100%
#889
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
100%
#890
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
100%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
99%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
99%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
98%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
98%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
98%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
96%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
94%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E2-9010 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE2-9010Athlon II X2 235e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X2 235e (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE2-9010Athlon II X2 235e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-9010 and Athlon II X2 235e

AMD

E2-9010

The E2-9010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,073 points. Launch price was $50.

AMD

Athlon II X2 235e

The Athlon II X2 235e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,079 points. Launch price was $84.

Processing Power

Both the E2-9010 and Athlon II X2 235e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the E2-9010 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 235e — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 235e (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The E2-9010 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X2 235e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E2-9010 scores 1,073 against the Athlon II X2 235e's 1,079 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X2 235e.

FeatureE2-9010Athlon II X2 235e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2048 kB+100%
1 MB
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,073
1,079
Geekbench 6 Single
240
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-9010 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 235e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-9010Athlon II X2 235e
Socket
FP4
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-9010) / AMD-V (Athlon II X2 235e). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 235e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 235e rivals Pentium E5300.

FeatureE2-9010Athlon II X2 235e
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop