E2-9010
VS
Celeron G1101

E2-9010 vs Celeron G1101

AMD

E2-9010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Celeron G1101

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-9010 is positioned at rank 926 and the Celeron G1101 is on rank 755, so the Celeron G1101 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9010

#914
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1641%
#915
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1617%
#916
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1484%
#917
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1478%
#918
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1464%
#920
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1414%
#921
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1356%
#922
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1353%
#923
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1317%
#926
E2-9010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1101

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14352%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13561%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9846%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2966%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2350%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2055%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1177%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1162%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1058%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1058%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1046%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1018%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1004%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
999%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
990%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
100%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
100%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
99%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
97%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E2-9010 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE2-9010Celeron G1101
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G1101 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE2-9010Celeron G1101
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-9010 and Celeron G1101

AMD

E2-9010

The E2-9010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,073 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

Processing Power

Both the E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the E2-9010 versus 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 — a 156.3% clock advantage for the E2-9010 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The E2-9010 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G1101 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-9010 scores 1,073 against the Celeron G1101's 1,086 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron G1101.

FeatureE2-9010Celeron G1101
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+715%
0.27 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.26 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,073
1,086+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-9010 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1101 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-9010Celeron G1101
Socket
FP4
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16.38 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-9010) / VT-x (Celeron G1101). The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the E2-9010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.

FeatureE2-9010Celeron G1101
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop