E2-9010
VS
Celeron 2961Y

E2-9010 vs Celeron 2961Y

AMD

E2-9010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Celeron 2961Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-9010 is positioned at rank 926 and the Celeron 2961Y is on rank 397, so the Celeron 2961Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9010

#914
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1641%
#915
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1617%
#916
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1484%
#917
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1478%
#918
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1464%
#920
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1414%
#921
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1356%
#922
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1353%
#923
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1317%
#926
E2-9010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2961Y

#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
98%
#385
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
541%
#386
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
533%
#387
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
489%
#388
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
487%
#389
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
483%
#391
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
466%
#392
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
447%
#393
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
446%
#394
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
434%
#397
Celeron 2961Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E2-9010 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 2961Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE2-9010Celeron 2961Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE2-9010Celeron 2961Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-9010 and Celeron 2961Y

AMD

E2-9010

The E2-9010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,073 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron 2961Y

The Celeron 2961Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the E2-9010 and Celeron 2961Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the E2-9010 versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 2961Y — a 66.7% clock advantage for the E2-9010 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The E2-9010 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 2961Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E2-9010 scores 1,073 against the Celeron 2961Y's 1,085 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron 2961Y.

FeatureE2-9010Celeron 2961Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+100%
1.1 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+82%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,073
1,085+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-9010 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 2961Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-9010Celeron 2961Y
Socket
FP4
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-9010) / VT-x (Celeron 2961Y). The Celeron 2961Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the E2-9010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2961Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2961Y rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureE2-9010Celeron 2961Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget