E2-9010
VS
Athlon II X2 250

E2-9010 vs Athlon II X2 250

AMD

E2-9010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 250

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-9010 is positioned at rank 926 and the Athlon II X2 250 is on rank 955, so the E2-9010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9010

#914
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1641%
#915
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1617%
#916
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1484%
#917
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1478%
#918
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1464%
#920
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1414%
#921
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1356%
#922
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1353%
#923
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1317%
#926
E2-9010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 250

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25118%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
23734%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17233%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5192%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4112%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3597%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2060%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2034%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1852%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1851%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1831%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1781%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1756%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1749%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1733%
#955
Athlon II X2 250
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#956
Core i3-2120T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $38
100%
#957
Phenom II X3 720
MSRP: $130|Avg: $64
99%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
99%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
98%
#960
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
98%
#961
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
98%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
97%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
96%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
95%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
95%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
95%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
94%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E2-9010 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE2-9010Athlon II X2 250
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X2 250 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE2-9010Athlon II X2 250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-9010 and Athlon II X2 250

AMD

E2-9010

The E2-9010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,073 points. Launch price was $50.

AMD

Athlon II X2 250

The Athlon II X2 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,080 points. Launch price was $39.

Processing Power

Both the E2-9010 and Athlon II X2 250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the E2-9010 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X2 250 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 250 (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The E2-9010 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X2 250 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E2-9010 scores 1,073 against the Athlon II X2 250's 1,080 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 250.

FeatureE2-9010Athlon II X2 250
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3 GHz+36%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2048 kB
2 MB
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,073
1,080
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-9010 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 250 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-9010Athlon II X2 250
Socket
FP4
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-9010) / true (Athlon II X2 250). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 250 rivals Pentium E5700.

FeatureE2-9010Athlon II X2 250
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true