EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4344P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 Cores24 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Threadripper Pro family

··

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4344P

8 / 16

33,821

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 / 24

33,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4344P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $820 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 253.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

2020

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 19,500).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4344P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?

Yes. EPYC 4344P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4344P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4344P is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4344P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4344P comes in $820 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 253.1% better value on MSRP (102.8 vs 29.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4344P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4344P

The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — a 20.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 18,500 (5.3% advantage for the EPYC 4344P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,652, a 17.1% lead for the EPYC 4344P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 11,500 (143.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+23%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Castle Peak (2020)
PassMark	33,821+1%	33,455
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,500+5%	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960+19%	1,652
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,896	11,500+507%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — the EPYC 4344P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).

Feature	EPYC 4344P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Socket	AM5	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+63%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	128+357%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	AMD-V
Target Use	Entry Server	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($329 vs $1149), EPYC 4344P was $820 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — making the EPYC 4344P the 111.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP	$329-71%	$1149
Performance per Dollar	102.8+253%	29.1
Release Date	2024	2020

Search EPYC 4344P on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.