EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
EPYC 4344P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4344P
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($314) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Castle Peak (2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+211%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($314) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4344P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
EPYC 4344P
The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — a 20.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 18,500 (5.3% advantage for the EPYC 4344P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,652, a 17.1% lead for the EPYC 4344P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 11,500 (143.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+23% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 33,821+1% | 33,455 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500+5% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960+19% | 1,652 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,896 | 11,500+507% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — the EPYC 4344P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4344P launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX debuted at $1149. At current prices ($314 vs $100), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is $214 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 107.7 pts/$ vs 334.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX the 102.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-71% | $1149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $314 | $100-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.7 | 334.6+211% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4344P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
