EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 5318Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4344P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 5318Y

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 5318Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4344P

8 / 16

33,821

+2.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 5318Y

24 / 48

33,139

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 5318Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 5318Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4344P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5318Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 28,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5318Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 5318Y

2021

Why buy it

✅+46.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4344P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4344P better than Xeon Gold 5318Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4344P is ahead with a 25.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5318Y pulls ahead with 46.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5318Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 46.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4344P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4344P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 5318Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 46.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (102.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4344P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 5318Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4344P

The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 5318Y

The Xeon Gold 5318Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,139 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5318Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5318Y has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318Y — a 43.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Xeon Gold 5318Y's 33,139 — a 2% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 28,500 (37.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,251, a 44.2% lead for the EPYC 4344P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 21,846 (168.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318Y.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	Xeon Gold 5318Y
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+56%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+81%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	33,821+2%	33,139
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,500	28,500+46%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960+57%	1,251
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,896	21,846+1052%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 5318Y — the EPYC 4344P supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5318Y supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5318Y). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 5318Y) — the Xeon Gold 5318Y offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and C621A,Ice Lake-SP (Xeon Gold 5318Y).

Feature	EPYC 4344P	Xeon Gold 5318Y
Socket	AM5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+77%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	6144 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5318Y). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Xeon Gold 5318Y targets Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Xeon Gold 5318Y rivals Xeon Silver 4316.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	Xeon Gold 5318Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Entry Server	Server / Virtualization