EPYC 4344P
Xeon Gold 6240R
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 6240R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 6240R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 6240R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4344P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,115 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 653.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 22,500).
Xeon Gold 6240R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+15.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅71.4% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4344P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4344P better than Xeon Gold 6240R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 6240R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4344P
The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.
Xeon Gold 6240R
The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R — a 28% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Xeon Gold 6240R's 33,353 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 22,500 (14.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,212, a 47.2% lead for the EPYC 4344P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 17,218 (160.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+32% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+12% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 24 MB+2300% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 33,821+1% | 33,353 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | 22,500+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960+62% | 1,212 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,896 | 17,218+808% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6240R — the EPYC 4344P supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6240R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) — the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R).
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+77% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1024 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6240R). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6240R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Server / High-load computing |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the Xeon Gold 6240R came in at $2444. On launch pricing ($329 vs $2444), EPYC 4344P was $2115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6240R — making the EPYC 4344P the 153.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-87% | $2444 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.8+656% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4344P and Xeon Gold 6240R
