
EPYC 4344P

Xeon w3-2535
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4344P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
- ✅Costs $410 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 45.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon w3-2535
2024Why buy it
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 19,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.2 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4344P better than Xeon w3-2535?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4344P
The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w3-2535
The Xeon w3-2535 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 33,367 points. Launch price was $739.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w3-2535 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon w3-2535 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w3-2535 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Xeon w3-2535's 33,367 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 17,500 (10.8% advantage for the EPYC 4344P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 2,254, a 14% lead for the Xeon w3-2535 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 12,400 (147% advantage for the Xeon w3-2535). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon w3-2535.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+15% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+22% | 26.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 33,821+1% | 33,367 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500+11% | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | 2,254+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,896 | 12,400+554% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2535 — the EPYC 4344P supports 18.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w3-2535 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2535). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2535) — the Xeon w3-2535 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and W790 (Xeon w3-2535).
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+18% | DDR5-4400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w3-2535). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w3-2535 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Xeon w3-2535 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Xeon w3-2535 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the Xeon w3-2535 came in at $739. On launch pricing ($329 vs $739), EPYC 4344P was $410 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 45.2 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2535 — making the EPYC 4344P the 77.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-55% | $739 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.8+127% | 45.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















