EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535

AMD

EPYC 4344P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon w3-2535

10 Cores20 Thrd185 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4344P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
  • Costs $410 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
  • Delivers 127.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 45.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon w3-2535

2024

Why buy it

  • 128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 19,500).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.2 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4344P better than Xeon w3-2535?
Yes. EPYC 4344P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 11.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 1.4% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4344P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4344P is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4344P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4344P comes in $410 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $739 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 127.7% better value on MSRP (102.8 vs 45.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w3-2535 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon w3-2535 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4344P

The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon w3-2535

The Xeon w3-2535 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 33,367 points. Launch price was $739.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w3-2535 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon w3-2535 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w3-2535 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Xeon w3-2535's 33,367 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 17,500 (10.8% advantage for the EPYC 4344P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 2,254, a 14% lead for the Xeon w3-2535 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 12,400 (147% advantage for the Xeon w3-2535). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon w3-2535.

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon w3-2535
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+15%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+9%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+22%
26.25 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
33,821+1%
33,367
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,500+11%
17,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960
2,254+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,896
12,400+554%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2535 — the EPYC 4344P supports 18.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w3-2535 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2535). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2535) — the Xeon w3-2535 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and W790 (Xeon w3-2535).

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon w3-2535
Socket
AM5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200+18%
DDR5-4400
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
64+129%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w3-2535). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w3-2535 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Xeon w3-2535 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Xeon w3-2535 rivals EPYC 7313.

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon w3-2535
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry Server
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the Xeon w3-2535 came in at $739. On launch pricing ($329 vs $739), EPYC 4344P was $410 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 45.2 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2535 — making the EPYC 4344P the 77.9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon w3-2535
MSRP
$329-55%
$739
Performance per Dollar
102.8+127%
45.2
Release Date
2024
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.