EPYC 4545P vs Xeon w5-2565X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4545P

16 Cores32 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w5-2565X

18 Cores36 Thrd240 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon w5-2565X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4545P

16 / 32

54,255

+3.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon w5-2565X

18 / 36

52,378

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon w5-2565X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon w5-2565X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4545P

2025

Why buy it

✅+3.6% higher PassMark.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Costs $840 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅Delivers 162.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 37.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 240W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2565X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon w5-2565X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (52,378 vs 54,255).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($1,389 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌269.2% higher power demand at 240W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4545P better than Xeon w5-2565X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w5-2565X is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4545P pulls ahead with 3.6% better PassMark. EPYC 4545P also has the bigger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4545P is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4545P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4545P comes in $840 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $1,389 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon w5-2565X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 162.1% better value on MSRP (98.8 vs 37.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4545P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 18/36. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 4545P vs Xeon w5-2565X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4545P

The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon w5-2565X

The Xeon w5-2565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,378 points. Launch price was $1,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-2565X offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon w5-2565X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2565X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Xeon w5-2565X's 52,378 — a 3.5% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w5-2565X.

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon w5-2565X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	18 / 36+13%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+13%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+71%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	54,255+4%	52,378

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2565X — the EPYC 4545P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-2565X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2565X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2565X) — the Xeon w5-2565X offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and W790 (Xeon w5-2565X).

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon w5-2565X
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	192	4096+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-2565X). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w5-2565X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon w5-2565X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon w5-2565X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4545P was priced at $549, while the Xeon w5-2565X came in at $1389. On launch pricing ($549 vs $1389), EPYC 4545P was $840 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 37.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2565X — making the EPYC 4545P the 89.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4545P	Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP	$549-60%	$1389
Performance per Dollar	98.8+162%	37.7
Release Date	2025	2024

Search EPYC 4545P on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-2565X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.