EPYC 7252
VS
Core Ultra 7 256V

EPYC 7252 vs Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

EPYC 7252

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7252

#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
112%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
109%
#83
EPYC 7252
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
95%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 256V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
105%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
101%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
96%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7252 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 256V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 256V ($350), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($350 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 256V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7252 and Core Ultra 7 256V

AMD

EPYC 7252

The EPYC 7252 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,411 points. Launch price was $475.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 256V

The Core Ultra 7 256V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,579 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7252 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 7 256V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7252 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 256V — a 40% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 256V (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7252 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7252 scores 19,411 against the Core Ultra 7 256V's 19,579 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 7 256V. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7252 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 256V.

FeatureEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 256V
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.8 GHz+50%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+41%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+167%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,411
19,579
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,065
Geekbench 6 Single
2,658
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7252 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 256V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 256V
Socket
SP3
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x 8533 MT/s
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7252) / true (Core Ultra 7 256V). The Core Ultra 7 256V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140V), while the EPYC 7252 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 256V targets Mobile.

FeatureEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 256V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile