EPYC 7252
VS
Core Ultra 7 266V

EPYC 7252 vs Core Ultra 7 266V

AMD

EPYC 7252

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7252

#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
112%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
109%
#83
EPYC 7252
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
95%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 266V

#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
112%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
108%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
105%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
104%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
104%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
100%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
91%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7252 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 266V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($520)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 266V ($520), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($520 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 266V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($520)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7252 and Core Ultra 7 266V

AMD

EPYC 7252

The EPYC 7252 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,411 points. Launch price was $475.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7252 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 7 266V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7252 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7252 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7252 scores 19,411 against the Core Ultra 7 266V's 19,274 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7252. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7252 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V.

FeatureEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 266V
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
5 GHz+56%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+41%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+167%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,411
19,274
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7252 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7252Core Ultra 7 266V
Socket
SP3
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%