EPYC 7301
VS
EPYC 7251

EPYC 7301 vs EPYC 7251

AMD

EPYC 7301

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017
VS
AMD

EPYC 7251

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7301

#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
102%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
102%
#163
EPYC 7301
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
99%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
98%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7251

#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
103%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
102%
#165
EPYC 7251
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
99%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
99%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The EPYC 7251 leads in gaming performance. However, the EPYC 7301 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightEPYC 7301EPYC 7251
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightEPYC 7301EPYC 7251
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7301 and EPYC 7251

AMD

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

AMD

EPYC 7251

The EPYC 7251 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,935 points. Launch price was $574.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7301 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7251 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 versus 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7251 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 7251 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7301 scores 14,991 against the EPYC 7251's 14,935 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7301. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7251.

FeatureEPYC 7301EPYC 7251
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
2.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+5%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+100%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
14,991
14,935
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the TR4 socket with PCIe 4.0.

FeatureEPYC 7301EPYC 7251
Socket
TR4
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0