EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P

AMD

EPYC 7343

16 Cores32 Thrd190 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7402P

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7343

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (43,644 vs 43,759).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.9 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).

EPYC 7402P

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $285 less on MSRP ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
  • Delivers 22.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.2 vs 27.9 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 190W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7343 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7402P better than EPYC 7343?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7343 is ahead with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7402P pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7402P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7402P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7402P comes in $285 cheaper on MSRP at $1,280 MSRP versus $1,565 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7343 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 22.6% better value on MSRP (34.2 vs 27.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7343 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7343

The EPYC 7343 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,644 points. Launch price was $1,565.

AMD

EPYC 7402P

The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7343 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7402P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7343 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P — a 15.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7343 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7343 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7402P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7343 scores 43,644 against the EPYC 7402P's 43,759 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7402P. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7343EPYC 7402P
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+16%
3.35 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+14%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)
128 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
43,644
43,759
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7343) and SP3 (EPYC 7402P).

FeatureEPYC 7343EPYC 7402P
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7343 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248.

FeatureEPYC 7343EPYC 7402P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7343 was priced at $1565, while the EPYC 7402P came in at $1280. On launch pricing ($1565 vs $1280), EPYC 7402P was $285 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7343 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 34.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7402P — making the EPYC 7402P the 20.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7343EPYC 7402P
MSRP
$1565
$1280-18%
Performance per Dollar
27.9
34.2+23%
Release Date
2021
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.