
EPYC 7343

EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7343
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,644 vs 43,759).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.9 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
EPYC 7402P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $285 less on MSRP ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.2 vs 27.9 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 190W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7343 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7402P better than EPYC 7343?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 7402P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7343
The EPYC 7343 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,644 points. Launch price was $1,565.

EPYC 7402P
The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7343 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7402P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7343 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P — a 15.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7343 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7343 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7402P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7343 scores 43,644 against the EPYC 7402P's 43,759 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7402P. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+16% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+14% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 43,644 | 43,759 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7343) and SP3 (EPYC 7402P).
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7343 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7343 was priced at $1565, while the EPYC 7402P came in at $1280. On launch pricing ($1565 vs $1280), EPYC 7402P was $285 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7343 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 34.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7402P — making the EPYC 7402P the 20.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1565 | $1280-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 34.2+23% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















