
EPYC 7343

Xeon w5-3435X
EPYC 7343 vs Xeon w5-3435X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7343 vs Xeon w5-3435X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7343 vs Xeon w5-3435X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7343
2021Why buy it
- ✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 270W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3435X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,644 vs 45,086).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3435X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w5-3435X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌1.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,589 MSRPvs$1,565 MSRP
- ❌42.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-3435X better than EPYC 7343?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7343 vs Xeon w5-3435X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7343
The EPYC 7343 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,644 points. Launch price was $1,565.

Xeon w5-3435X
The Xeon w5-3435X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,086 points. Launch price was $1,589.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7343 and Xeon w5-3435X share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7343 versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-3435X — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3435X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7343 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7343 scores 43,644 against the Xeon w5-3435X's 45,086 — a 3.3% lead for the Xeon w5-3435X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7343 vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+184% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 43,644 | 45,086+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7343 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7343 versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3435X — the Xeon w5-3435X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7343) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3435X) — the EPYC 7343 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7343) and W790 (Xeon w5-3435X).
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-3435X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7343) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3435X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7343 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Xeon w5-3435X rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7343 was priced at $1565, while the Xeon w5-3435X came in at $1589. On launch pricing ($1565 vs $1589), EPYC 7343 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7343 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3435X — making the Xeon w5-3435X the 1.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7343 | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1565-2% | $1589 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 28.4+2% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















