EPYC 7343 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M

EPYC 7343 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7343

16 / 32

43,644

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Platinum 8352M

32 / 64

44,406

+1.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7343 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7343 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7343

2021

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Costs $2,906 less on MSRP ($1,565 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅Delivers 180.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 9.9 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8352M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,644 vs 44,406).

Xeon Platinum 8352M

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 185W instead of 190W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 27.9 PassMark/$ ($4,471 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8352M better than EPYC 7343?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8352M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8352M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8352M is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7343 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8352M comes in 185.7% more expensive on MSRP at $4,471 MSRP versus $1,565 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7343 is also 180.8% better value on MSRP (27.9 vs 9.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8352M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7343 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7343

The EPYC 7343 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,644 points. Launch price was $1,565.

Xeon Platinum 8352M

The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7343 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7343 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — a 10.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 7343 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7343 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7343 scores 43,644 against the Xeon Platinum 8352M's 44,406 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352M. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7343 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M.

Feature	EPYC 7343	Xeon Platinum 8352M
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+167%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	43,644	44,406+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7343 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7343) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) — the EPYC 7343 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7343) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M).

Feature	EPYC 7343	Xeon Platinum 8352M
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7343) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352M). Direct competitor: EPYC 7343 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7343	Xeon Platinum 8352M
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7343 was priced at $1565, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M came in at $4471. On launch pricing ($1565 vs $4471), EPYC 7343 was $2906 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7343 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 9.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352M — making the EPYC 7343 the 95% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7343	Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP	$1565-65%	$4471
Performance per Dollar	27.9+182%	9.9
Release Date	2021	2021

Search EPYC 7343 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8352M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.