EPYC 7443
VS
Core Ultra 9 275HX

EPYC 7443 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX

AMD

EPYC 7443

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7443

#300
EPYC 9255
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $1934
108%
#301
EPYC 8324P
MSRP: $1895|Avg: $3598
107%
#302
Xeon Gold 6414U
MSRP: $2296|Avg: $283
107%
#303
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $2495
106%
#304
EPYC 7352
MSRP: $1350|Avg: $725
106%
#305
Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP: $1789|Avg: $2544
105%
#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
104%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
103%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
102%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
102%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
102%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
101%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
100%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
100%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
100%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
100%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
99%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
98%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
98%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
97%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
97%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
94%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
94%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
94%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
93%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
92%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
117%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
107%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
102%
#43
Core Ultra 9 275HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
96%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,800) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7443 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7443Core Ultra 9 275HX
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,800)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 275HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($1,800 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7443Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,800)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7443 and Core Ultra 9 275HX

AMD

EPYC 7443

The EPYC 7443 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.85 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,743 points. Launch price was $2,010.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7443 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 7443 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.85 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7443 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7443 scores 56,743 against the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 56,018 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7443. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7443 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX.

FeatureEPYC 7443Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
24 / 24
Boost Clock
4 GHz
5.4 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2.85 GHz+6%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+256%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+500%
Process
7 nm+
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
PassMark
56,743+1%
56,018
Geekbench 6 Single
2,835
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,908
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7443 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7443 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — the EPYC 7443 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7443 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7443) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7443) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) — the EPYC 7443 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7443) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX).

FeatureEPYC 7443Core Ultra 9 275HX
Socket
SP3
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200+63900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
4096
256 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 9 275HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 275HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the EPYC 7443 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7443 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX.

FeatureEPYC 7443Core Ultra 9 275HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel Arc Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-End Gaming Laptop