EPYC 7473X
VS
Core Ultra 9 285HX

EPYC 7473X vs Core Ultra 9 285HX

AMD

EPYC 7473X

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7473X

#400
EPYC 7713P
MSRP: $5010|Avg: $2443
107%
#401
Xeon W-2145
MSRP: $1113|Avg: $145
107%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
106%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
106%
#405
Xeon 6737P
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $4995
105%
#406
Xeon Gold 6342
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $3000
104%
#407
Xeon Gold 6438N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
104%
#408
Xeon 6747P
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
103%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
101%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
101%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
101%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
100%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
100%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
100%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
100%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
99%
#418
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
MSRP: $11699|Avg: $11699
99%
#419
Xeon 6736P
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
98%
#420
EPYC 9655P
MSRP: $10811|Avg: $7958
98%
#421
EPYC 9554P
MSRP: $7104|Avg: $3052
97%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
96%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
95%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
95%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
95%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
95%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
94%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285HX

#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
120%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
109%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
101%
#32
Core Ultra 9 285HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
93%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($200) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7473X is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7473XCore Ultra 9 285HX
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Milan-X (2022) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 285HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($200 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7473XCore Ultra 9 285HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7473X and Core Ultra 9 285HX

AMD

EPYC 7473X

The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285HX

The Core Ultra 9 285HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,732 points. Launch price was $650.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7473X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 285HX's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285HX — a 39.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285HX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7473X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7473X scores 59,280 against the Core Ultra 9 285HX's 58,732 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7473X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285HX.

FeatureEPYC 7473XCore Ultra 9 285HX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
24 / 24
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5.5 GHz+49%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
768 MB (total)+2033%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
3 MB (per core)+500%
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Milan-X (2022)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
59,280
58,732
Geekbench 6 Single
3,106
Geekbench 6 Multi
22,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7473X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7473X versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285HX — the EPYC 7473X supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7473X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7473X) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 285HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7473X) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 285HX) — the EPYC 7473X offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7473X) and Intel HM870 (Core Ultra 9 285HX).

FeatureEPYC 7473XCore Ultra 9 285HX
Socket
SP3
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200+63900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
4096
192 GB+4915100%
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 9 285HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7473X) vs true (Core Ultra 9 285HX). The Core Ultra 9 285HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the EPYC 7473X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Core Ultra 9 285HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.

FeatureEPYC 7473XCore Ultra 9 285HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel Arc Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true