
EPYC 7643P vs Core i5-10400F

EPYC 7643P

Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7643P
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7643P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,722) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7643P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+350%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,722) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7643P and Core i5-10400F

EPYC 7643P
The EPYC 7643P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 77,307 points. Launch price was $2,722.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7643P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7643P has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7643P versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7643P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7643P scores 77,307 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 142.3% lead for the EPYC 7643P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7643P vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+700% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+2033% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 77,307+493% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7643P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7643P versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the EPYC 7643P supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7643P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7643P) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7643P) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the EPYC 7643P offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7643P) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+79900% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 128 GB+3276700% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7643P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7643P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7643P launched at $2722 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($2722 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $2620 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7643P delivers 28.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 127.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2722 | $160-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2722 | $102-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4 | 127.7+350% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















