EPYC 7D12
VS
Core Ultra 5 245KF

EPYC 7D12 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF

AMD

EPYC 7D12

32 Cores64 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 245KF

14 Cores14 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7D12

#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
107%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
106%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
106%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
105%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
105%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
104%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
104%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
100%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
100%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
100%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
100%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
100%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
97%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
97%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
96%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
95%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
94%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
94%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
93%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 245KF

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1357%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1282%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
931%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
280%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
222%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
194%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
111%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
110%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
100%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
100%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
99%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
96%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
95%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
94%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
94%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
92%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
90%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
89%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
88%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
87%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
84%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
82%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
82%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
81%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($100) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7D12 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7D12Core Ultra 5 245KF
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rome (2020) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 5 245KF ($189), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($89 less, 89% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7D12Core Ultra 5 245KF
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+84%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7D12 and Core Ultra 5 245KF

AMD

EPYC 7D12

The EPYC 7D12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rome (2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 42,285 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 245KF

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,424 points. Launch price was $294.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7D12 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the EPYC 7D12 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7D12 versus 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245KF — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245KF (base: 1.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 7D12 uses the Rome (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7D12 scores 42,285 against the Core Ultra 5 245KF's 43,424 — a 2.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7D12 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245KF.

FeatureEPYC 7D12Core Ultra 5 245KF
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+129%
14 / 14
Boost Clock
3 GHz
5.2 GHz+73%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+282%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+33%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+500%
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Rome (2020)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
42,285
43,424+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7D12 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7D12 versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245KF — the Core Ultra 5 245KF supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7D12 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7D12) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 245KF). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7D12) vs 20 (Core Ultra 5 245KF) — the EPYC 7D12 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7D12) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245KF).

FeatureEPYC 7D12Core Ultra 5 245KF
Socket
SP3
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+2033%
192
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 245KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7D12 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7D12) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245KF). The Core Ultra 5 245KF includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)), while the EPYC 7D12 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7D12 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Core Ultra 5 245KF rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

FeatureEPYC 7D12Core Ultra 5 245KF
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7D12 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF debuted at $294. At current prices ($100 vs $189), the EPYC 7D12 is $89 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7D12 delivers 422.9 pts/$ vs 229.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245KF — making the EPYC 7D12 the 59.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7D12Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP
$1000
$294-71%
Avg Price (30d)
$100-47%
$189
Performance per Dollar
422.9+84%
229.8
Release Date
2020
2024