EPYC 7D12
VS
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

EPYC 7D12 vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

AMD

EPYC 7D12

32 Cores64 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

12 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7D12

#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
107%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
106%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
106%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
105%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
105%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
104%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
104%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
100%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
100%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
100%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
100%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
100%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
97%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
97%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
96%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
95%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
94%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
94%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
93%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
115%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
105%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($100) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7D12 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7D12Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rome (2020) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 ($600), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($500 less, 500% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7D12Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+488%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

AMD

EPYC 7D12

The EPYC 7D12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rome (2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 42,285 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7D12 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7D12 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7D12 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7D12 uses the Rome (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7D12 scores 42,285 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 2.1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7D12 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

FeatureEPYC 7D12Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+167%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3 GHz
5 GHz+67%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+191%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Rome (2020)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
42,285
43,174+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7D12 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7D12 versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7D12 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7D12) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7D12) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the EPYC 7D12 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7D12) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).

FeatureEPYC 7D12Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Socket
SP3
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
8000+150%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+3100%
128
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+357%
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the EPYC 7D12 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7D12 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.

FeatureEPYC 7D12Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
AMD Radeon 8050S
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7D12 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. At current prices ($100 vs $600), the EPYC 7D12 is $500 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7D12 delivers 422.9 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the EPYC 7D12 the 141.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7D12Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP
$1000
$600-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$100-83%
$600
Performance per Dollar
422.9+487%
72.0
Release Date
2020
2025