EPYC 7D12 vs Xeon W-3275
EPYC 7D12
Xeon W-3275
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7D12
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7D12 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Rome (2020) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7D12 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1488%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7D12 and Xeon W-3275
EPYC 7D12
The EPYC 7D12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rome (2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 42,285 points. Launch price was $800.
Xeon W-3275
The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7D12 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon W-3275 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7D12 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7D12 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7D12 uses the Rome (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3275 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7D12 scores 42,285 against the Xeon W-3275's 41,267 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 7D12. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7D12 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275.
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+14% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+127% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 38.5 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 28 MB+5500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rome (2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 42,285+2% | 41,267 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7D12 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3275 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7D12 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7D12) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7D12) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275) — the EPYC 7D12 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7D12) and C621 (Xeon W-3275).
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7D12) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275). Direct competitor: EPYC 7D12 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7D12 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275 debuted at $4449. At current prices ($100 vs $1550), the EPYC 7D12 is $1450 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7D12 delivers 422.9 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275 — making the EPYC 7D12 the 176.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-78% | $4449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-94% | $1550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 422.9+1490% | 26.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7D12 and Xeon W-3275
