
EPYC 7F32

Ryzen 7 3800XT
EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7F32
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,441).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 430.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.7 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3800XT better than EPYC 7F32?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F32
The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.


Ryzen 7 3800XT
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 3800XT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3800XT (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7F32 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F32 scores 23,253 against the Ryzen 7 3800XT's 23,441 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3800XT. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 23,253 | 23,441 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F32 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7F32) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7F32 was priced at $2100, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT came in at $399. On launch pricing ($2100 vs $399), Ryzen 7 3800XT was $1701 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F32 delivers 11.1 pts/$ vs 58.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3800XT — making the Ryzen 7 3800XT the 136.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2100 | $399-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 58.7+429% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














