EPYC 7F32 vs Xeon W-2175

EPYC 7F32 vs Xeon W-2175 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7F32

8 / 16

23,253

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-2175

14 / 28

23,507

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F32 vs Xeon W-2175 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F32 vs Xeon W-2175: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F32

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,507).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.

Xeon W-2175

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($1,947 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($1,947 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7F32 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2175 better than EPYC 7F32?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7F32 is ahead with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2175 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. EPYC 7F32 also has the bigger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2175 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2175 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2175 comes in $153 cheaper on MSRP at $1,947 MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7F32 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 9.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 11.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7F32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and 66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7F32 vs Xeon W-2175 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F32

The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.

Xeon W-2175

The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7F32 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2175 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2175 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7F32 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-2175 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F32 scores 23,253 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-2175. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32 vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.

Feature	EPYC 7F32	Xeon W-2175
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+48%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+66%	19.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	23,253	23,507+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F32 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7F32	Xeon W-2175
Socket	SP3	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7F32 was priced at $2100, while the Xeon W-2175 came in at $1947. On launch pricing ($2100 vs $1947), Xeon W-2175 was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F32 delivers 11.1 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2175 — making the Xeon W-2175 the 8.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7F32	Xeon W-2175
MSRP	$2100	$1947-7%
Performance per Dollar	11.1	12.1+9%
Release Date	2020	2017

Search EPYC 7F32 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2175 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.