EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F32

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,301 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 161.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.0 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 23,253).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7F32 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is ahead with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7F32 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7F32 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7F32 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7F32 comes in 162.8% more expensive on MSRP at $2,100 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is also 161.7% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 11.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7F32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F32

The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7F32 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7F32 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F32 scores 23,253 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7F32. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.

Feature	EPYC 7F32	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.2 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	23,253	23,150

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F32 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7F32	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Socket	SP3	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7F32 was priced at $2100, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X came in at $799. On launch pricing ($2100 vs $799), Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was $1301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F32 delivers 11.1 pts/$ vs 29.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X the 89.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7F32	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP	$2100	$799-62%
Performance per Dollar	11.1	29.0+161%
Release Date	2020	2017

Search EPYC 7F32 on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.