EPYC 9115
VS
Core Ultra 7 265HX

EPYC 9115 vs Core Ultra 7 265HX

AMD

EPYC 9115

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

20 Cores20 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9115

#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
107%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
105%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
100%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
100%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
95%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265HX

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
123%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
121%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
115%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
110%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
100%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
93%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
85%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($726) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9115 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 9115Core Ultra 7 265HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)
More affordable ($450)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 265HX ($450), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($276 less, 38% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 9115Core Ultra 7 265HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+63%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)
More affordable ($450)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9115 and Core Ultra 7 265HX

AMD

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265HX

The Core Ultra 7 265HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 48,975 points. Launch price was $500.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9115 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265HX offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265HX — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 9115 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9115 scores 48,343 against the Core Ultra 7 265HX's 48,975 — a 1.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9115 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265HX.

FeatureEPYC 9115Core Ultra 7 265HX
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
20 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
5.3 GHz+29%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+113%
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+200%
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
PassMark
48,343
48,975+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,990
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,417
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9115 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9115 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265HX — the EPYC 9115 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9115) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9115) vs 20 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) — the EPYC 9115 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9115) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 7 265HX).

FeatureEPYC 9115Core Ultra 7 265HX
Socket
SP5
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+95900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
6144
192 GB+3276700%
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 265HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9115) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265HX). The Core Ultra 7 265HX includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU), while the EPYC 9115 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

FeatureEPYC 9115Core Ultra 7 265HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9115 launched at $726 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265HX debuted at $450.

FeatureEPYC 9115Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP
$726
$450-38%
Avg Price (30d)
$726
Release Date
2024
2025