EPYC 9135 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9135

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E7-8895 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9135

16 / 32

57,808

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon E7-8895 v2

15 / 30

57,165

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9135

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Costs $5,627 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Delivers 469.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌29% higher power demand at 200W vs 155W.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 155W instead of 200W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,165 vs 57,808).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011, while EPYC 9135 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9135 better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?

Yes. EPYC 9135 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9135 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9135 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9135 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9135 comes in $5,627 cheaper on MSRP at $1,214 MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 469.8% better value on MSRP (47.6 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9135 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011, 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9135 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9135

The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9135 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the EPYC 9135 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9135 (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 9135 is built on the Turin (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 9135 scores 57,808 against the Xeon E7-8895 v2's 57,165 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9135. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+7%	15 / 30
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+19%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.65 GHz+30%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+71%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	—
PassMark	57,808+1%	57,165

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9135 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9135 versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — the EPYC 9135 supports 275% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1536 — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9135) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9135) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) — the EPYC 9135 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9135) and C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2).

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Socket	SP5	FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	6000+275%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	6144+300%	1536
RAM Channels	12+200%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+220%	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9135 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P; Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9135 was priced at $1214, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 came in at $6841. On launch pricing ($1214 vs $6841), EPYC 9135 was $5627 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9135 delivers 47.6 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — making the EPYC 9135 the 140.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP	$1214-82%	$6841
Performance per Dollar	47.6+467%	8.4
Release Date	2024	2014

Search EPYC 9135 on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-8895 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.