EPYC 9274F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
EPYC 9274F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9274F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9274F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9274F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (73,982 vs 74,985).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.2 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $565 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9274F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than EPYC 9274F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9274F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9274F
The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9274F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 4.05 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9274F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9274F scores 73,982 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 4.05 GHz+12% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 73,982 | 74,985+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 53,977 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,686 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 29,745 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9274F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9274F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — the EPYC 9274F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9274F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9274F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9274F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9274F was priced at $3060, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($3060 vs $2495), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was $565 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9274F delivers 24.2 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 21.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9274F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3060 | $2495-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.2 | 30.1+24% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9274F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
