EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9274F

24 Cores48 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9274F

24 / 48

73,982

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 / 96

74,982

+1.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9274F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Costs $1,431 less on MSRP ($3,060 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.2 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (73,982 vs 74,982).

Xeon Platinum 8461V

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 300W instead of 320W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8461V better than EPYC 9274F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9274F is ahead with a 28.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8461V pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. EPYC 9274F also has the bigger cache pool with 162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8461V is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8461V is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9274F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8461V comes in 46.8% more expensive on MSRP at $4,491 MSRP versus $3,060 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9274F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9274F is also 44.8% better value on MSRP (24.2 vs 16.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8461V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 24/48. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9274F

The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.

Xeon Platinum 8461V

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9274F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8461V has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — a 15% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 4.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9274F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9274F scores 73,982 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8461V. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	48 / 96+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+16%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	4.05 GHz+84%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+163%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	73,982	74,982+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9274F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9274F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8461V). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9274F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) — the EPYC 9274F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9274F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8461V). Direct competitor: EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9274F was priced at $3060, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($3060 vs $4491), EPYC 9274F was $1431 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9274F delivers 24.2 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V — making the EPYC 9274F the 36.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP	$3060-32%	$4491
Performance per Dollar	24.2+45%	16.7
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9274F on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8461V on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.