EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 7C13
EPYC 9354
EPYC 7C13
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9354
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7C13
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,498) | ✅ More affordable ($2,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+29%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,498) | ✅ More affordable ($2,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9354 and EPYC 7C13
EPYC 9354
The EPYC 9354 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,892 points. Launch price was $3,420.
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9354 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7C13 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354 versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9354 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9354 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 7C13 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9354 scores 73,892 against the EPYC 7C13's 76,363 — a 3.3% lead for the EPYC 7C13. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.68 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz+63% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 73,892 | 76,363+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,538 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 37,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9354 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7C13 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9354 versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 — the EPYC 9354 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9354) vs 8 (EPYC 7C13). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354) and SP3 (EPYC 7C13).
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 4096 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9354 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354) vs AMD-V (EPYC 7C13). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9354 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9354 launched at $3420 MSRP, while the EPYC 7C13 debuted at $2000. At current prices ($2498 vs $2000), the EPYC 7C13 is $498 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354 delivers 29.6 pts/$ vs 38.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7C13 — making the EPYC 7C13 the 25.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3420 | $2000-42% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2498 | $2000-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.6 | 38.2+29% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9354 and EPYC 7C13
