EPYC 9354P vs EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9354P
EPYC 9274F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9354P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9274F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9354P | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,205) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,490) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9354P | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+14%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,205) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,490) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9354P and EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9354P
The EPYC 9354P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 74,808 points. Launch price was $2,730.
EPYC 9274F
The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9354P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9274F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9354P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354P versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F — a 12.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 3.25 GHz vs 4.05 GHz). Both are built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture using a 5 nm, 6 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9354P scores 74,808 against the EPYC 9274F's 73,982 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9354P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9354P | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz | 4.05 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 74,808+1% | 73,982 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354P) and SP5 (EPYC 9274F).
| Feature | EPYC 9354P | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9354P rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9354P | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9354P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the EPYC 9274F debuted at $3060. At current prices ($2205 vs $2490), the EPYC 9354P is $285 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354P delivers 33.9 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9274F — making the EPYC 9354P the 13.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9354P | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730-11% | $3060 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2205-11% | $2490 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.9+14% | 29.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9354P and EPYC 9274F
