EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8368

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9355P

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8368

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9355P

32 / 64

97,249

+5.6%

Ryzen 9 7945HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon Platinum 8368

38 / 76

92,054

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8368 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8368: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,216 less on MSRP ($2,998 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 154.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9355P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (92,054 vs 97,249).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9355P moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9355P better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Yes. EPYC 9355P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9355P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9355P is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 349.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9355P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9355P comes in $4,216 cheaper on MSRP at $2,998 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 154.2% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9355P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 38/76. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9355P vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9355P

The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9355P (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 5.5% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	38 / 76+19%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+29%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.55 GHz+48%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+349%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	97,249+6%	92,054
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9355P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9355P versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — the EPYC 9355P supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9355P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9355P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the EPYC 9355P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+88%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9355P was priced at $2998, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 came in at $7214. On launch pricing ($2998 vs $7214), EPYC 9355P was $4216 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the EPYC 9355P the 87.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP	$2998-58%	$7214
Performance per Dollar	32.4+153%	12.8
Release Date	2024	2021

Search EPYC 9355P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8368 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.