EPYC 9575F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
EPYC 9575F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9575F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9575F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9575F
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 30,170).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Costs $92 less on MSRP ($11,699 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than EPYC 9575F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9575F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9575F
The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 17.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 30,170 (2.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 96 / 192+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+32% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 147,718 | 176,281+19% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 180,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,308 | 30,170+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9575F versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9575F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400+7% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Frequency | High-end Workstation / AI Rendering |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9575F was priced at $11791, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX came in at $11699. On launch pricing ($11791 vs $11699), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX was $92 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX the 18.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11791 | $11699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 15.1+21% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
