EPYC 9575F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
EPYC 9575F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9575F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,238) | ✅ More affordable ($7,999) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,238) | ✅ More affordable ($7,999) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
EPYC 9575F
The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,149 points. Launch price was $7,349.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX's 133,149 — a 10.4% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 24,780 (16.7% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 147,718+11% | 133,149 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,599 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,308+18% | 24,780 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Frequency | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX debuted at $7349. At current prices ($9238 vs $7999), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is $1239 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX the 4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11791 | $7349-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9238 | $7999-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0 | 16.6+4% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
