EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9755
EPYC 9575F vs EPYC 9755 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9575F vs EPYC 9755 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9575F vs EPYC 9755: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9575F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,193 less on MSRP ($11,791 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 400W instead of 500W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 512 MB).
EPYC 9755
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,300 vs 29,308).
- ❌10.1% HIGHER MSRP$12,984 MSRPvs$11,791 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 500W vs 400W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9575F better than EPYC 9755?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9575F vs EPYC 9755 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9575F
The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.
EPYC 9755
The EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 166,328 points. Launch price was $12,984.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9755 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9755 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9755 — a 19.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the EPYC 9755's 166,328 — a 11.9% lead for the EPYC 9755. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 29,300 (0% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9755.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | EPYC 9755 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 128 / 256+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+22% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+22% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 512 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 147,718 | 166,328+13% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,308 | 29,300 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9755 supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and SP5 (EPYC 9755).
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | EPYC 9755 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 9 TB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, EPYC 9755 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9755 rivals Xeon 6980P.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | EPYC 9755 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Frequency | Data Center / Cloud Computing |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9575F was priced at $11791, while the EPYC 9755 came in at $12984. On launch pricing ($11791 vs $12984), EPYC 9575F was $1193 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9755 — making the EPYC 9755 the 2.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | EPYC 9755 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11791-9% | $12984 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 12.8+2% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9575F and EPYC 9755
