CPU
GPU
EPYC 9575F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9575F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Why is EPYC 9575F better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX?
The AMD EPYC 9575F and the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX represent the absolute peak of AMDs enterprise compute power, but they are optimized for different environments. The EPYC 9575F is a "Turin" server processor built on the newer Zen 5 architecture, featuring 64 cores and a world-class 5.0 GHz boost clock. In contrast, the Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a Zen 4 "Storm Peak" workstation king with a massive 96 cores and 192 threads.
The EPYC 9575F is specifically designed for frequency-sensitive workloads in the data center, making it superior for tasks like high-frequency trading or AI-driven simulations where single-core speed is as important as core count. However, the Threadripper PRO 7995WX, with its 96 cores, remains the multi-threaded throughput champion for high-end workstations. It offers 50% more physical cores, making it the better tool for massive 3D rendering jobs, multi-layered video encoding, and high-density software compiling.
Both processors support state-of-the-art PCIe 5.0 and multi-channel DDR5 memory, though the EPYC supports a 12-channel configuration for massive memory bandwidth compared to the 8-channel setup on the Threadripper. Choosing between them depends on whether you value the newer Zen 5 architectural efficiency and higher clock speeds (EPYC 9575F) or the sheer brute-force parallel processing power of a 96-core workstation architecture (7995WX).
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($9,238) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,879.97) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+10%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($9,238) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,879.97) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
EPYC 9575F
The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 81,000 (93.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 96 / 192+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+32% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 147,718+3% | 143,017 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 148,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,308 | 81,000+176% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Frequency | Workstation / Scientific Computing |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. At current prices ($9238 vs $9879.97), the EPYC 9575F is $642 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the EPYC 9575F the 9.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9575F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11791 | $9999-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9238-6% | $9879.97 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0+10% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9575F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
