EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9845
EPYC 9655P vs EPYC 9845 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9655P vs EPYC 9845 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9655P vs EPYC 9845: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,753 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9845
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (152,985 vs 160,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (320 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9655P better than EPYC 9845?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9655P vs EPYC 9845 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9655P
The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.
EPYC 9845
The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9655P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9845 offers 160 cores / 320 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655P (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the EPYC 9845's 152,985 — a 4.8% lead for the EPYC 9655P. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P vs 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192 | 160 / 320+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+22% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+24% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+20% | 320 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 160,490+5% | 152,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,287 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and SP5 (EPYC 9845).
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center / AI Training |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9655P was priced at $10811, while the EPYC 9845 came in at $13564. On launch pricing ($10811 vs $13564), EPYC 9655P was $2753 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9845 — making the EPYC 9655P the 27.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10811-20% | $13564 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8+31% | 11.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9655P and EPYC 9845
