EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

AMD

EPYC 9655P

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

96 Cores192 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
Threadripper Pro family
··

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 81,000).
    • 8.1% HIGHER MSRP
      $10,811 MSRPvs$9,999 MSRP

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

    2023

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Costs $812 less on MSRP ($9,999 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
    • Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than EPYC 9655P?
    Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 233.5% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 233.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9655P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX comes in $812 cheaper on MSRP at $9,999 MSRP versus $10,811 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9655P is also 3.8% better value on MSRP (14.8 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9655P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9655P

    The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

    AMD

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

    The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.

    Processing Power

    Both the EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX share an identical 96-core/192-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9655P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 11.5% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,287 vs 81,000 (107.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
    Cores / Threads
    96 / 192
    96 / 192
    Boost Clock
    4.5 GHz
    5.1 GHz+13%
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz+4%
    2.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    384 MB (total)
    384 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm-20%
    5 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Storm Peak (2023)
    PassMark
    160,490+12%
    143,017
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    148,000
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,100
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    24,287
    81,000+234%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 9655P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9655P versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — the EPYC 9655P supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9655P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).

    FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
    Socket
    SP5
    sTR5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000+15%
    DDR5-5200
    Max RAM Capacity
    6 TB+200%
    2048 GB
    RAM Channels
    12+50%
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

    FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    true
    Target Use
    Data Center / Single Socket
    Workstation / Scientific Computing
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9655P was priced at $10811, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX came in at $9999. On launch pricing ($10811 vs $9999), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX was $812 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the EPYC 9655P the 3.7% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
    MSRP
    $10811
    $9999-8%
    Performance per Dollar
    14.8+3%
    14.3
    Release Date
    2024
    2023

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.