EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

AMD

EPYC 9655P

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

96 Cores192 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
Threadripper Pro family
···

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $888 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (24,287 vs 30,170).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • 8.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $11,699 MSRPvs$10,811 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than EPYC 9655P?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 24.2% better Geekbench multi-core, 9.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 24.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX comes in 8.2% more expensive on MSRP at $11,699 MSRP versus $10,811 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.5% better value on MSRP (15.1 vs 14.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 96/192, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9655P

The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX share an identical 96-core/192-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9655P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 9.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Multi-core Geekbench: 24,287 vs 30,170 (21.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Cores / Threads
96 / 192
96 / 192
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
5.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+4%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
384 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark
160,490
176,281+10%
Cinebench R23 Multi
180,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
24,287
30,170+24%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9655P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9655P versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9655P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).

FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Socket
SP5
sTR5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6400+7%
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+200%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
true
Target Use
Data Center / Single Socket
High-end Workstation / AI Rendering
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9655P was priced at $10811, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX came in at $11699. On launch pricing ($10811 vs $11699), EPYC 9655P was $888 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX the 1.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9655PRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
MSRP
$10811-8%
$11699
Performance per Dollar
14.8
15.1+2%
Release Date
2024
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.